Menu

  • Home
  • City History (About)
  • Complaints (Contact)
  • USC Football
  • USC General
  • Movies
Skip to content

City of Angles

Cut off one angle, two more shall take its place

Branding

New USC Athletics Branding

Posted on April 18, 2016 by commbro

Before you read this post, swing by USCTrojans.com and check out the announcement.

What the heck just happened? Did athletics really need rebranding? Fixing what ain’t broke—and making it worse.

How do you go thinking you can improve something that’s been working for 100 years? Too many questions and not enough answers. Granted, not every single one of those things were 100 years old, but all of it carried a legacy.

They paid actual money for these “updates”. Consultants, man-hours, and when it’s all done, replacing courts, uniforms, equipment, banners, and even paper. Yes, letterhead can incur cost a pretty penny—or in this case, an ugly one. Whatever the case, it’s a cost too high to make a few things more pale. That happen naturally out in the sun, man.

Maybe I’m alone here and if I am, I’ll quietly endure these changes in the corner—but I’m willing to bet I’m not. Yet these designs got passed around more hands than a joint amongst junkies and somehow still got the green light.

Speaking of green, what’s up with this font? After a simple color change, some of the letters look like the pipes from Mario Bros.

I can almost hear the sound effects

It may be difficult for stylistic things to be objectively worse, but this rebranding sure wants to prove that statement wrong.

In case you’re still unsure what I’m griping about, it’s:

  1. Washing out the colors
  2. Inconsistent serifs
  3. Inconsistent kerning
  4. Wasting money
  5. Wasting time

Athletic Director Pat Haden was about three months away from retiring and he leaves us with these things to ponder…

CommBro Breaker

Maybe I’m overreacting a little. I can live with them removing the “Trojans” over the interlocking SC. It just doesn’t really fit in a lot of stuff. They’ve been inconsistent with its use anyway. Just take a look at almost anything in the renovated Heritage Hall or the neck of the jerseys. The continuing loss of color is probably what bugs me the most.

The changes seemed so unnecessary and wasteful…kind of like this other thing.

USC Logo

Alright, I think I beat that one to death. It’s just the latest chapter of unneeded “modernization.” Something more substantial would be like the Coliseum losing almost 16,000 seats. I wish I could say I was some old soul that just recoils at any change, but I’ve slept on this one for a night or two—and about 5 years for that shield thing.

Maybe Lynn Swann can save us from ourselves.

Relics of the Past

  • November 2022
  • November 2021
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • Home
  • City History (About)
  • Complaints (Contact)
  • USC Football
  • USC General
  • Movies

Enter your email address to follow this crap and receive email notifications

Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • City of Angles
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • City of Angles
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...